Kendrick Johnson was a 17-year-old student who was found dead in a rolled-up wrestling mat in 2013. The initial autopsy concluded that his death was accidental, but a second autopsy found that he had suffered blunt force trauma to the neck. The case remains unsolved, and the Johnsons and their supporters believe that Johnson was murdered.
This introduction is attractive because it is short, to the point, and attention-grabbing. It also provides some basic information about the case, such as the fact that Johnson was a teenager who was found dead in a rolled-up wrestling mat. The introduction also mentions the two autopsies that were conducted, and the fact that the case remains unsolved.
The introduction is also effective because it uses strong action verbs, such as “found” and “suffered.” These verbs help to create a sense of urgency and suspense, which makes the reader want to learn more about the case.
Kendrick Johnson Autopsy
Who moved Johnson’s body and tampered with the crime scene?
There is no clear answer to who moved Kendrick Johnson’s body and tampered with the crime scene. The GBI has said that they believe Johnson’s death was an accident, and that there is no evidence of foul play. However, the Johnsons and their supporters believe that Johnson was murdered, and that his body was moved and the crime scene was tampered with to make it look like an accident.
There are a few possible suspects in the case, but no one has been charged with Johnson’s murder. The Johnsons have named two of Johnson’s classmates, Brian and Branden Bell, as suspects. The Bells have denied any involvement in Johnson’s death.
The GBI has investigated the case, but they have not been able to find any evidence to support the Johnsons’ claims of foul play. The case remains open, but it is unlikely that it will ever be solved.
Why did the GBI not find these injuries in their initial autopsy?
There are a few possible explanations for why the GBI did not find the injuries to Kendrick Johnson’s neck in their initial autopsy.
- The injuries may have been missed during the initial autopsy. This is possible if the injuries were not visible on the surface of the body, or if they were not significant enough to be noticed.
- The injuries may have been caused after Johnson’s death. This is possible if Johnson’s body was moved or tampered with after he died.
- The injuries may have been misinterpreted by the GBI. This is possible if the GBI did not have the proper training or experience to identify the injuries.
The GBI has said that they believe the injuries were caused after Johnson’s death, and that they were not visible during the initial autopsy. However, the Johnsons and their supporters believe that the injuries were caused before Johnson’s death, and that the GBI missed them during the initial autopsy.
The circumstances surrounding Kendrick Johnson’s death remain a mystery, and the reason why the GBI did not find the injuries to his neck in their initial autopsy may never be known.
In addition to the above, here are some other possible reasons why the GBI may not have found the injuries to Kendrick Johnson’s neck:
- The injuries may have been small or superficial, and may not have been detected during the autopsy.
- The injuries may have been obscured by other injuries, such as the injuries to Johnson’s head.
- The injuries may have been missed due to human error.
- What were the findings of the initial autopsy?
The initial autopsy, conducted by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI), concluded that Johnson’s death was accidental positional asphyxia. This means that Johnson died as a result of being trapped upside down in the rolled-up wrestling mat.
- What were the findings of the second autopsy?
The second autopsy, conducted by Dr. William R. Anderson, found that Johnson had suffered blunt force trauma to the neck, which he concluded was the cause of death. Anderson also found that Johnson’s body had been moved after his death, and that there was evidence of tampering with the crime scene.
- What are the differences between the two autopsies?
The main difference between the two autopsies is the cause of death. The GBI’s autopsy concluded that Johnson’s death was accidental, while Dr. Anderson’s autopsy concluded that Johnson was murdered.
- What are the implications of the second autopsy?
The second autopsy has raised new questions about Johnson’s death, and has led to calls for a new investigation. The Johnsons and their supporters believe that the second autopsy proves that Johnson was murdered, and that the GBI’s investigation was flawed.
- What is the status of the investigation into Johnson’s death?
The investigation into Johnson’s death is still ongoing. The GBI has said that they are still investigating the case, but they have not released any new information.
- What are the chances of the case being solved?
It is difficult to say what the chances of the case being solved are. The investigation has been ongoing for several years, and there have been no arrests made. However, the Johnsons and their supporters are still hopeful that the case will be solved one day.